|
||||||||||||
|
The need for an all-water trade route became obvious after Jefferson's Louisiana Purchase in 1803. The promise of great lands was confirmed by the reports brought back by Lewis and Clark in 1806, leading to a flood of migration to the west. An additional water route was required, and Congress commissioned a study for a canal to replace the portage. In 1818, Illinois was admitted to statehood. At that time the northern border of the state, originally intended to be near the south tip of Lake Michigan, was moved many miles north so that the entire potential route of the canal would be in a single jurisdiction.29 | |||||||||||
The report to Congress in 183330 is full of enthusiasm (and hyperbole); "There is not, perhaps, on the face of the globe, a place where such a mighty physical revolution could be produced with so little human labor."31 An Illinois and Michigan Canal was proposed, at an estimated cost of $4,299,43932, which later grew to a construction cost of $6.5 million. |
||||||||||||
To feed the canal and operate the locks, water was to be supplied from many of the rivers and streams along the route. Water was also to be pumped into the canal from the Chicago River, which induced a slight flow out of Lake Michigan in dry weather.35 |
||||||||||||